Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +405%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200B
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
219W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy