Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro VII

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro VII

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro VII to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro VII 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1700MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro VII +283%
13.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
May 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
3840
112
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
408.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.11 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.06 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.528 TFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Vega 20
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT WS (215-0914026)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy