Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 172% (2580MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600 +171%
9.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
100W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 23
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy