Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (950MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +582%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
30W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Oland
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy