Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (1845MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +52%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2019
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1670 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1408
112
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
100W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 14
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy