Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1440MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +203%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
165W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA100
Zaphod
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy