Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD FirePro S10000 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 74% (1650MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (85W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +24%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
85W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 14
Zaphod
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy