Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 +15%
3.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Mar 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
195W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GK104
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy