Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (265W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +21%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Server
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

265W
TDP
274W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy