Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9010 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

AMD FirePro S9010 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S9010 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9010 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9010 +135%
2.867 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy