Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +9117%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT216
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy