Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9050 +13%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jul 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
TU116
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy