Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs Intel Arc A750

AMD FirePro S9150 vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +239%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
3584
176
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
DG2-512
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy