Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +12897%
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2816
Shading Units
16
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT218
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy