Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +714%
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2816
Shading Units
240
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
219W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
G92B
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy