Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +930%
52.22 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1438 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
736.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
10240
176
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
285.6 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
816.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.22 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.22 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
816.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
AD103
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
AD103-400-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
320W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy