Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

AMD FirePro S9150 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +4969%
5.069 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2816
Shading Units
48
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
19W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GF119
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy