Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +54%
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1792
176
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
190W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tonga
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy