Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD FirePro S9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170 +1253%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2816
Shading Units
128
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
G92B
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy