Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

AMD FirePro S9170 vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 and 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +58%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro
Generation
Console GPU(ASUS)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
518.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Phoenix
Hawaii XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
25.39 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy