Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (235W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +57%
7.987 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2816
256
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
235W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Hawaii
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy