Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +254%
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6950
2.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Dec 2010
FirePro
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1408
256
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.253 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
563.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
200W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Cayman
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy