Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (130W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7600 +150%
19.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2048
256
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
130W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Navi 33
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy