Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

ATI FirePro V3800 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40 +569%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
1024
20
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
DG2-128
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy