Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI FirePro V3750

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 48W)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +47%
0.52 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
320
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
48W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV730
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy