Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
280 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +170%
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jul 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
120
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
RV630
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy