Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 215W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800 +9%
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
320
20
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
-
-
-
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

43W
TDP
215W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
R600
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy