Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX

ATI FirePro V3800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 330W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock2435MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XTX +4694%
24.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2435 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
400
Shading Units
5120
20
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
311.7 GPixel/s
13.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
779.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.87 TFLOPS
520.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.93 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.558 TFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
330W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 21
Redwood PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTXH (215-121000247)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy