Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

ATI FirePro V3900 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900 +1850%
0.624 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
2
480
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV620
Turks GL
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy