Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

ATI FirePro V3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 635 OEM +19%
0.743 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.736 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.94 GTexel/s
-
-
-
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
742.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.94 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GK208
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy