Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

ATI FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +5020%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2012
Release Date
Nov 2023
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
624.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 32
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy