Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 635 OEM +19%
0.743 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
-
400
Shading Units
384
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.736 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.94 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
742.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.94 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
GK208
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy