Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +824%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
44
400
Shading Units
2816
20
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Vesuvius
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy