Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT +3714%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
80
400
Shading Units
5120
20
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 21
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

69W
TDP
335W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy