CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
VS
ATI FirePro V4800
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+3714%
23.65 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
VS
Radeon RX 6950 XT
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
80
400
Shading Units
5120
20
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
15.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
620.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Redwood
GPU Name
Navi 21
Redwood XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.627 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
104 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
69W
TDP
335W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon HD 8740 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4800
2
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs ATI FirePro V4800
3
ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
4
ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ATI FirePro V4800
6
NVIDIA P106 100 vs ATI FirePro V4800
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER vs ATI FirePro V4800
8
ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
9
ATI FirePro V4800 vs AMD Radeon VII
10
ATI FirePro V4800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy