Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +220%
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Apr 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
6
Compute Units
-
480
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
G92B
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy