Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +43%
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
480
Shading Units
216
24
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GT200
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy