Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 83W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jul 2005
FirePro
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
12
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
83W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
NV41
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy