Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +1243%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
480
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GA100
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy