Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
15904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 +10652%
82.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Sep 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
128
480
Shading Units
16384
24
TMUs
512
8
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
450W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
AD102
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy