Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +53%
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
20
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Oland
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy