Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 350W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (710.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
10272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 5080 +6955%
54.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jan 2025
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
710.1GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
84
480
Shading Units
10752
24
TMUs
336
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
846.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
54.19 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
54.19 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
846.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
350W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GB203
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
GB203-400-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
377 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
10.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy