Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 AGP

ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3450 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 3450 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +1500%
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3450 AGP
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
2
480
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV620
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x Molex

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy