Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP

ATI FirePro V4900 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 52.99GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +79%
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jan 2008
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
52.99GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
4
480
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.69 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.69 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
427.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.50 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
RV670
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy