Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo +1734%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jun 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
475W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Vega 20
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy