Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 36.80GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +28%
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
36.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
6
480
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Oland
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy