Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 5600 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 125W)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5600 OEM +732%
6.39 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jan 2020
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1130 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
199.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.78 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.390 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
399.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 10
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy