Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +208%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
Tahiti
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
Orthrus
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy