Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +834%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
GA100
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy