Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 74W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +13%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
Lexa
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy