Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +71%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy